mak ing changes to attribute tables directly in your map. The multi ple- threaded 64-bit application is designed to work faster.

The contextual, ribbon-based interface will be familiar to users of Microsoft Office, Adobe, Google, i. Īfter an initial adjustment of getting familiar with ArcGIS Pro, you will find your workflows becom e faster and more streamlined. This is also true for third – party extensions common to E&P workflows – many providers have already made their extensions available in ArcGIS Pro, and, like Exprodat, are focusing on d elivering new functionality in their ArcGIS Pro versions, while only keeping the lights on in their legacy ArcMap versions. A nd a s ArcGIS Pro matures and surpasses ArcMap’s capabilities, it gets further and further ahead – anyone not using it will lose the benefits it presents. A s of ArcGIS 10.8, no new functionality is being added to ArcMap – all Esri’s effort is going into ArcGIS Pro. That said, it is gradually being phased out, and it has been many years since we’ve seen ArcMap onstage at any Esri conference. I t’ ll likely be a good few years before it can be unpicked from huge government organisation s in the US and elsewhere and laid to rest.

Here are four reasons why I think now is a good time to take the plunge and move away from ArcMap to ArcGIS Pro. įor these reasons, and with budgets and workloads under pressure in current circumstances, other companies struggle to justify the migration, and are holding off for now. This requires effort – understanding what and how to deploy, redeveloping and testing existing ArcMap customisations, reimag in ing workflows, migrating data, and managing and training staff. As ArcGIS Pro has matured and gradually reached feature parity with ArcMap, more and more energy companies we work with are migrating to ArcGIS Pro.

It’s been five years since Esri first released ArcGIS Pro, its next generation desktop GIS application.

Arcmap dissolve